Update browser for a secure Made experience

It looks like you may be using a web browser version that we don't support. Make sure you're using the most recent version of your browser, or try using of these supported browsers, to get the full Made experience: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.

LUISI CONDUCTS TCHAIKOVSKY'S FIFTH

Dallas Symphony Orchestra Jeremy Denk, piano
Orchestral Series
Saturday, June 29, 2024 at 6pm Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater

The Dallas Symphony Orchestra gives Bravo! Vail’s first Symphonic Commissioning Project premiere of the summer— Anna Clyne’s ATLAS for piano and orchestra featuring pianist Jeremy Denk—in addition to Tchaikovsky’s triumphant Symphony No. 5, led by Luisi.

Did you know?

The music of Anna Clyne makes a return visit to Vail through her ATLAS, co-commissioned by Bravo! Vail and the Dallas Symphony. A piano concerto in all but name, it was inspired by works of the German artist Gerhard Richter.

Featured Artists

Fabio Luisi

conductor

Jeremy Denk

piano

Program Highlights

  • Fabio Luisi, conductor 
  • Jeremy Denk, piano 

ANNA CLYNE ATLAS for Piano and Orchestra (Co-Commission with the Dallas Symphony Orchestra) 

TCHAIKOVSKY Symphony No. 5 

PRE-CONCERT TALK 5:10PM - Jonathan Bellman (University of Northern Colorado), speaker in the Gerald R Ford Amphitheater Lobby.

Meet the Artist Q&A - Jeremy Denk and Anne-Marie McDermott - Immediately following the performance

Program Notes

ATLAS for Solo Piano and Orchestra (2024; Co-commission of Bravo! Vail and the Dallas Symphony Orchestra)

(30 minutes)

ANNA CLYNE (B.1980)

ATLAS for Solo Piano and Orchestra
(Co-commissioned by Bravo! Vail and the
Dallas Symphony Orchestra) 
SYMPHONIC COMMISSIONING PROJECT
     VOLUME I (1962-1974)
     VOLUME II (1966-1988)
     VOLUME III (1978-2006)
     VOLUME IV (2002-2013)

Anna Clyne is a native of London but has lived elsewhere for much of her career: in Scotland for her schooling at the University of Edinburgh, then in the United States, where she earned a master’s degree in composition at the Manhattan School of Music and gained attention for works of unusual breadth and vibrancy. During the 2023-24 season she has served as composer-in-residence with Helsinki Philharmonic and BBC Philharmonic, and as artist-in-residence with the Symphony Orchestra of Castilla y León. These are the most recent of residencies that in preceding years have also included the Chicago Symphony, Baltimore Symphony, and Scottish Chamber Orchestra. In 2015, her composition Prince of Clouds, for two violins and orchestra, was nominated for a GRAMMY for Best Contemporary Classical Composition, and in 2016 she was awarded the Hindemith Prize by the Schleswig-Holstein Music Festival in Germany. She collaborates on cross-genre creative projects, including with filmmakers, visual artists, and choreographers, having provided music for works at the Royal Ballet in London and the San Francisco Ballet. She often writes pieces in reaction to specific visual artworks and to pieces by canonical composers, which serve as points of departure or as material for musical commentary. Indeed, she composed ATLAS as a musical response to photographs. She explains: “Set in four movements, my first piano concerto is inspired by (and titled after) the monumental, four-volume publication ATLAS, which maps the ideas, processes, and inspirations of the German artist Gerhard Richter. Conceived and closely edited by Richter himself, this comprehensive compendium cuts straight to the heart of the artist’s thinking, collecting more than 5,000 photographs, drawings, and sketches that he has compiled or created since the moment of his creative breakthrough in 1962.” She then provides guidance for listeners interested in delving more deeply into this connection: “My music responds to the imagery contained in these four volumes to create a musical montage and a lucid narrative. Examples of the imagery are listed below.”
VOLUME I (1962-1974)
Photographic Experiments 1969;
Stars 1968; Spheres 1968; Fire
1968; Photographic Details of
Colour Samples 1970; Cities (in
Sketches of a Room) 1968; Clouds
(in Sketches of a Room) 1970
VOLUME II (1966-1988)
Sketches (Constellations) 1967;
Sketches (Numbers) 1978;
Sketches (Colour Charts) 1966;
Colour Fields 1973; Still Lifes (Skull)
1983; Abstract Pictures 1977; Still
Lifes (Apples and Bottle) 1984-88
VOLUME III (1978-2006)
Various Motifs 1978/84/88;
Cathedral Corner 1984/88;
Sketches (Connecting Piece) 1989;
Sketches (Frames) 1990; The Black
Forest 1991; Railway Embankment
1990-94; Houses in the Snow (Sils-
Maria) 2004
VOLUME IV (2002-2013)
Tree Trunks 2002; Beach and
Tideland 2002; Sun 2002; Glass
Planes 2006; Various Structures
and Silicate 2006; Structure
“Pearls” 2006; Strip Studies 2010

INTERMISSION

(18 minutes)

Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64 (1888)

(47 minutes)

PYOTR ILYICH TCHAIKOVSKY (1840-93)

Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64
     Andante—Allegro con anima
     Andante cantabile, con alcuna licenza
     Valse: Allegro moderato
     Finale: Andante maestoso—Allegro
       vivace—Moderato assai e molto
       maestoso

Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky spent the summer of 1888 at a vacation home he had built on a forested hillside at Frolovskoe, not far from his home base in Moscow. The idyllic locale apparently played a major role in his managing to complete this symphony in the short span of four months. He made a habit of keeping his patron, Nadezhda von Meck, informed about his compositions through detailed letters, and thanks to this ongoing correspondence we have a good deal of information about how the Fifth Symphony progressed during that summer. “I shall work my hardest,” he wrote to her. “I am exceedingly anxious to prove to myself, as to others, that I am not played out as a composer. Have I told you that I intend to write a symphony? The beginning was difficult, but now inspiration seems to have come. We shall see ....” His correspondence throughout those months brims with allusions to the emotional background to this piece, which involved resignation to fate, the designs of providence, murmurs of doubt, and similarly dark thoughts.

Critics blasted the symphony when he conducted its premiere, in 1888, due in part to the composer’s limited skill on the podium; and yet the audience was enthusiastic. Always given to insecurity and vulnerable to criticism, he worried about “some over-exaggerated color, some insincerity of fabrication which the public instinctively recognizes. It was clear to me that the applause and ovations referred not to this but to other works of mine, and that the Symphony itself will never please the public.” And elsewhere, he wrote, “the organic sequence fails, and a skillful join has to be made ... I cannot complain of lack of inventive power, but I have always suffered from want of skill in the management of form.”

These comments reveal considerable self-awareness; one might say that Tchaikovsky was wrong, but for all the right reasons. The work’s orchestral palette is indeed colorful, despite the fact that the composer employs an essentially Classical orchestra of modest proportions. And “the management of form,” never his strong suit, is certainly not as tight as in his Fourth Symphony, which he had unveiled a decade earlier. “If Beethoven’s Fifth is Fate knocking at the door,” wrote a commentator when the piece was new, “Tchaikovsky’s Fifth is Fate trying to get out.” It nearly does so in a journey that threatens to culminate in a series of climactic B-major chords. But notwithstanding the frequent interruption of audience applause at that point, the adventure continues to a conclusion that is to some extent ambiguous: four closing E-major chords that we may hear as triumphant but may just as easily sound ominous.